response to motion to disqualify attorneyimperial armour compendium 9th edition pdf trove

/P 505 0 R 28 0 obj << Frequently, a former client accuses the attorney of having insider information regarding the client that does not rise to the level of a client confidence. /P 12 0 R /Pg 46 0 R /Pg 19 0 R endobj /Rotate 0 >> /Pg 44 0 R The trial court heard oral argument on the motion, and on August 9, `%qs2"Z(-> ^eZAst`zqz~5{=rvvl6r7rhi_WSztQa%_`e.~QFCPN!Px:v7Pp}VDl|RUjND,a5KFVo}W4+7H/)fJ%o5mgS9BFcQ7HP13+Fxk{N25 wx7O)&[ /iCw %Fk|7on6 r9rH_wFS&`E9T8`jPDlm(n /Kids [40 0 R 41 0 R 42 0 R 43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R] << ; Utica Mut. Such motions are sometimes followed by either a grievance or a legal malpractice claim. /S /P 105 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /P 528 0 R 142 0 obj /Pg 30 0 R /S /P /P 162 0 R endobj /S /P As with the substantial relationship test, whether an attorneys playbook knowledge is sufficient for disqualification is heavily dependent on the facts. 306 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /Length 533 0 R /S /P /P 12 0 R << /K [58 303 0 R 60] stream 10-0101 San Francisco, CA 94102-3478 (415) 436-6660 (415) 436-6683 (Fax) Attorneys for Plaintiff the United States of America Also filed on behalf of 10 Plaintiff States (See signature block) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 301 0 obj >> A motion to recuse is a legal motion filed in court that says a judge should be disqualified, or removed, from a legal case for a reason listed within CCP 170.1. 2023 Dentons. /Pg 33 0 R >> endobj 0000008931 00000 n /K [2 329 0 R 9 330 0 R 11] endobj << /S /P /Lang (EN-US) In fact, the plaintiff's attorney conceded in open court, "I can honestly state I am not completely pre-pared to respond to the motion for summa-ry judgment." The judge, however, allowed the plaintiff to submit a brief on the . 198 0 obj >> << /Lang (EN-US) /S /Link /Lang (EN-US) /Annots [] /Pg 46 0 R endobj /S /P %PDF-1.7 % /K 18 /Lang (EN-US) /K 10 (a) A court that determines that a person has signed a pleading or motion in violation of Section 10.001may impose a sanction on the person, a party represented by the person, or both. endobj /S /P Woodard v. Dist. 165 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Rotate 0 136 0 obj >> 50 0 obj /Rotate 0 304 0 obj >> /S /P 199 0 obj 1 [233 0 R 234 0 R 235 0 R 236 0 R 237 0 R 238 0 R 239 0 R 240 0 R 241 0 R 242 0 R 40 326 0 R 41 329 0 R 42 330 0 R] Sharp ("Defendant's Motion"). /P 508 0 R >> /Lang (EN-US) >> >> /P 505 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 508 0 R << /Pg 15 0 R << /S /TOCI /P 505 0 R << /S /P >> The Motion Clerk shall enter the "Answer" or "Response" Date on the Cover Sheet. /Resources 391 0 R 294 0 R 296 0 R 298 0 R 300 0 R 302 0 R] endobj /Rotate 0 << << /Resources 387 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 15 0 R >> /S /P /S /P /S /P 159 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R /P 506 0 R The conflict is imputed to everyone in the law firm, and most certainly the firm will require more than one week to respond to the motion to disqualify. /A 515 0 R << >> endobj >> >> 362 0 obj /Pg 44 0 R /K 33 /Pg 37 0 R /Tabs /S /Producer <6954657874AE20352E352E3920A9323030302D323031352069546578742047726F7570204E5620284147504C2D76657273696F6E29> endobj /Parent 10 0 R /Pg 46 0 R Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. << /Kids [35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R] /K 331 0 R >> endobj >> /Type /Page endobj << 739, 743-44 (S.D.N.Y. /K 3 /S /P << << /Resources 399 0 R 40 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) endobj 323 0 obj /K 15 /P 529 0 R /K 9 273 0 obj >> /K [47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R /K 11 >> /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /S /Reference /Pg 45 0 R 298 0 R 299 0 R 298 0 R null 300 0 R 301 0 R 300 0 R null 302 0 R 303 0 R Cf. >> /S /P >> << endobj Once the above requirements are met, the judge must enter an order granting disqualification if the motion to disqualify is "legally sufficient.". << LAi7p:0qX t` P7SP.X8v('bsX.LC8p) iV 3C4=H0u2Fd Cg. /Parent 3 0 R 117 0 obj In Brothers, the defendants tried to disqualify the prosecuting attorneys for being potential trial witnesses because the prosecutors had participated in a meeting in which the defendant was offered immunity. /S /P United States v. Wallach, 788 F. Supp. << >> /K 3 /P 12 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) % << endobj /S /Reference /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) << /S /TOCI /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /S /H1 Motions to disqualify are far from rare occurrences. << << 739, 744 (S.D.N.Y. Id. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K 3 /S /P >> /K 41 >> 305 0 obj /S /P %%EOF >> 325 0 obj A motion to disqualify shall be . /K 24 /K 19 >> 59 0 obj endobj << /K [7 519 0 R] >> >> /P 4 0 R << 6. /Pg 22 0 R /S /P /S /P /K 4 endobj /P 12 0 R << 264 0 obj endobj /K 4 /K 3 >> /Pg 46 0 R v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., No. /P 134 0 R >> endobj << Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 224 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) 103 0 obj See Swisher, The Practice and Theory of Lawyer Disqualification, 27 Geo. /K 1 /Lang (EN-US) << 273 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R] 243 0 obj and specifically allege the facts and reasons relied on to show the grounds for disqualification and shall be sworn to . /K 21 << /K [14 523 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) endobj << /S /P /Lang (EN-US) >> /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] >> 2. /Lang (EN-US) /S /P endobj endobj /StructParents 30 /P 12 0 R 157 0 obj /Parent 10 0 R endobj /K 6 endobj Ct. App . /S /P Motions to disqualify are far from rare occurrences. 0000002415 00000 n endobj >> /Contents [368 0 R 369 0 R 370 0 R] 106 0 obj Litigation and Dispute Resolution in the UnitedStates, Four Things to Know About Motions to Disqualify. >> /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /Annots [] /Rotate 0 << /CropBox [0 0 612 792] << /P 12 0 R /P 529 0 R << 278 0 R 279 0 R 278 0 R null 280 0 R 281 0 R 280 0 R null 282 0 R 283 0 R /S /Reference << 213 0 obj Co. of Am., No. /StructParents 32 280 0 obj /S /TOCI HarrisT19@michigan.gov . <> << >> /P 55 0 R /K 32 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /P 531 0 R << << /S /P /K [42 295 0 R 44] 9. /S /P endobj << endobj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> >> /Lang (EN-US) >> /P 528 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /P 12 0 R << endobj /S /P /Lang (EN-US) endobj << << /Contents [459 0 R 460 0 R 461 0 R] /K 2 /Pg 46 0 R >> /Tabs /S You have to fill out at least 2 forms, maybe more, to file your opposition. /Lang (EN-US) /S /P 302 0 obj 45 0 obj << /S /Table /Resources 375 0 R /K 3 endobj 10 [106 0 R 107 0 R 108 0 R 109 0 R] endobj /Lang (EN-US) /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K 32 >> >> /P 282 0 R A motion to disqualify should be made with "reasonable promptness" after the party becomes aware of the conflict so that it cannot be used as a strategic tool to deprive his opponent of counsel after a substantial amount of time has been spent on a case. << endobj Instead, Colo. RPC 1.9(a) provides that, [a] lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that persons interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing. endobj /Tabs /S /Lang (EN-US) /Contents [408 0 R 409 0 R 410 0 R] /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) >> 253 0 obj /S /H1 /S /P 25 [158 0 R 159 0 R] /P 123 0 R 0000004782 00000 n << /P 162 0 R << << /Pg 16 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 167 0 obj /K 9 364 0 obj >> /Annotation /Span /Lang (EN-US) 22 [149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R] /S /P 272 0 obj /P 12 0 R 298 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) endobj << 242 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Resources 395 0 R >> /Nums [0 [47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 203 0 R 204 0 R 205 0 R 206 0 R 207 0 R 208 0 R /K 17 >> /Pg 16 0 R 44 0 obj /P 12 0 R /S /H3 /S /P 6 313 0 R 7 314 0 R 8 [84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /P 506 0 R >> /Annots [412 0 R 413 0 R 414 0 R] /Annots [] /S /P endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] Secure .gov websites use HTTPS /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K 1 /Pg 18 0 R 12 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) << /Pg 39 0 R /Pg 16 0 R As the prosecutors have no personal knowledge of the events prior to their meeting with the defendant, they are not material witnesses to those events and should not be called to testify. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << /K 35 11 0 obj Rule 4-1.6 provides that, except in limited circumstances, "a lawyer shall not reveal information relating to representation of a client. /P 509 0 R Courts also appear to distinguish between conflicts based on multiple representations and those based on successive representations.5 After all, parties filing disqualification motions based on multiple representation conflicts are typically strangers to the attorneyclient relationship. /K 1 See, e.g., People v. Shari, 204 P.3d 453, 457 (Colo. 2009) (distinguishing between duties to current clients under Colo. RPC 1.7 and to former clients under Colo. RPC 1.9). /Pg 22 0 R >> /S /Footnote >> In the motion, Petitioner alleged he was . . /K 5 /Annots [] /P 12 0 R /S /P endobj /P 12 0 R /K 16 are satisfied. >> /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 16 0 R << /Pg 15 0 R /K 1 >> 3. /Annots [] /S /P 14-CV-01885-RM-BNB, 2014 WL 7177378 at *2 (D.Colo. /K 1 /S /P In determining whether to disqualify an attorney on the ground that he or she will likely be a witness, the court is guided, but not bound by, the standards set forth in Rule 3.7, and whether to disqualify an attorney rests in the sound discretion of the Court. /K 9 << 191 0 R] 4. on January 7, 2002. 291 0 obj In addition, if the motion is made by a former client, attorneys should consider providing notice of a potential circumstance to their legal malpractice insurer. 90 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) northwoods educational foundation, inc.'s reply to plaintiff's response to motion to disqualify and response to motion for sanctions /Tabs /S /Parent 9 0 R 145 0 obj /P 124 0 R >> 168 0 obj . /Rotate 0 filed a motion to disqualify the judge under CCP 170.1 [challenge of trial judge for cause] based on purported bias that the judge demonstrated during the first. /S /TOCI 37 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /StructParents 20 180 0 obj /Parent 6 0 R /Tabs /S /S /H1 /S /P << /Pg 38 0 R /Lang (EN-US) Sharp, and the response of the United States. << /P 12 0 R /K 3 /Contents [441 0 R 442 0 R 443 0 R] Mark White, Esq. 316 0 obj 2022 California Rules of Court. /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Pages >> << << /S /P /Type /Page << /S /TOCI /K 14 /Pg 29 0 R /Pg 28 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Parent 6 0 R endobj /S /P endobj /P 531 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> >> 146 0 obj /P 12 0 R The motion can be brought by either a prosecutor . /Pg 22 0 R 123 0 obj Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. /K 0 /K 2 endobj /K 2 endobj << 14 0 obj /Annots [] /P 12 0 R endobj Typically, a former client seeking to disqualify a former attorney from representing an opposing party must identify specific, cogent information that the attorney possesses and show that the information is confidential and implicates the duty of loyalty. 319 0 obj /Rotate 0 /Lang (EN-US) >> /P 132 0 R 289 0 obj endobj /Pg 45 0 R /K 3 Notice of Motion and Motion. endobj 233 0 obj Sharp ("Defendant's Motion"). 212 0 obj /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) endobj 0000003370 00000 n /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 230 0 obj 8 0 obj /Type /Page /Rotate 0 /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R After this hearing, M retained counsel (C.H.). 239 0 obj /Tabs /S /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 302 0 R null] << endobj << << /P 508 0 R /S /P RESPONSE to Motion re 31 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC(an Arizona Corporation), Ed Magedson(an individual). /Lang (EN-US) However, by understanding the underpinnings of this ethical issue, attorneys will be better prepared to anticipate, respond to, or even avoid motions to disqualify. /S /P /S /P /P 12 0 R >> /Parent 9 0 R /S /Link 0000000896 00000 n /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 28 0 R This sample opposition to California motion to vacate judgment with an attorney affidavit of fault is used to oppose a motion made under the mandatory attorney affidavit of fault provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 473 (b) on several grounds including that the motion is untimely, does not include the required attorney affidavit of /K 5 endobj 49 0 obj The motion is legally sufficient if it shows the party's well-grounded fear that the party will not receive a fair trial. /K 0 /Pg 20 0 R /K 30 /Pg 16 0 R endobj /P 296 0 R 194 0 obj 1985) (finding defendant had a compelling need for prosecutor's testimony when that testimony was the only source of vital evidence). Mar. 64 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Count 5 endobj endobj /S /P 313 0 obj /S /P /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> See Fed. /S /P /K 6 /Annots [] 283 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) Motion to Disqualify - 4 should include disqualifying an attorney for a party for conflicts of interest under the RPCs. While the government takes exception to the defendant's statement of "facts" in his Motion, it is evident that neither prosecutor Rosman nor Sharp was a witness to any events that occurred on June 21, 1995, before they met with the defendant. /K [304 0 R 306 0 R 308 0 R 310 0 R 312 0 R] /P 124 0 R These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia. 89 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) An important requirement contained in rule 2.160 (e) is that a disqualification motion must be made within 10 days after the "discovery of the facts constituting the grounds" for the motion. RESPONSE TO SOME SPECIFIC CLAIMS OF IMPROPRIETY IN THE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY (1) THE CLAIM: Special Counsel breached confidentiality by allowing a DMS employee to be present for sworn testimony of numerous witnesses. /K 0 /Type /Page Two Special Agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Frank Eldredge and James Hawkins, were present during the entirety of the meeting between the defendant and the prosecutors and are available to testify to the events in question. endobj /Type /Pages 26 0 obj endobj Where witnesses other than the prosecutor can testify to the same matters or conversations, no compelling need exists." /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 17 0 R endobj /Pg 26 0 R /S /P /P 508 0 R << /P 12 0 R /Contents [376 0 R 377 0 R 378 0 R] gov%2Fdoc1%2F031119586589 &label=Case+Filing. /S /Link /K 31 /Rotate 0 /Lang (EN-US) << /S /Link >> /S /P /K [54 301 0 R 56] RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISQUALIFY ATTORNEY DREW MAZZEO By: Drew Mazzeo Bauer Pitman Snyder Huff Lifetime Legal, PLLC 1235 4th Ave E #200 Olympia, WA 98506 (360) 754-1976 dpm@lifetime.legal Attorney for Petitioner FILED SUPREME COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON 1012212019 8 :00 AM BY SUSAN L. CARLSON CLERK /StructParents 21 ANSWER or RESPONSE DATE. /Pg 21 0 R /P 508 0 R << 21 0 obj endobj /K 13 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /DropCap /Figure /P 509 0 R /K 38 /P 12 0 R /Pg 37 0 R /Pg 45 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K 6 /Rotate 0 [ii] However, an order is final and appealable when it disqualifies a law firm which has represented a defendant during the trial from continuing its representation during an appeal, due to a conflict created when an attorney who represented the . << /K 19 /Pg 25 0 R /Count 5 << /Lang (EN-US) /Contents [437 0 R 438 0 R 439 0 R] Please do not message me here on Avvo. /S /P /K 9 << /Lang (EN-US) 346 0 obj /K [1 326 0 R 15] 3.7." Venters, 293 Kan. at 103. /P 509 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) >> /Rotate 0 Attorneys understandably may feel apprehensive about the threat of a motion to disqualify, given the potential risk and loss of work. /Lang (EN-US) /S /P << << /Pg 19 0 R endobj <>stream /Pg 16 0 R Where a conflict exists, an effective written consent is the best defense to a motion to disqualify. District Attorney McEachern made no response to any of the claims presented in Mr. Williams's Application. endobj endobj /S /Table >> endobj Once a motion to disqualify the judge in question has been filed, the judge will be served a copy of the affidavit. >> The attorney may know the clients bottom line for settlement or how the client prefers to approach litigation. /Lang (EN-US) /Resources 490 0 R /Pg 15 0 R >> 27 [165 0 R 166 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R null 331 0 R null] >> endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R Brown v. Encompass Ins. /K 19 endobj /S /H2 /S /TOCI /K 10 endobj >> /P 12 0 R /K 2 >> /P 12 0 R << /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /S /P /Lang (EN-US) 0000002515 00000 n Make certain each and every area has been filled in properly. 54 0 obj endobj << endobj /P 531 0 R NME's motion was based on the confidences that it had imparted to the attorney in the prior representation under a joint defense agreement. /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Tabs /S << Notice of Motion and Motion: The . << /Lang (EN-US) /K 22 >> /Pg 30 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] >> Health, Education & Family Services Division . << endobj /S /P /K [322 0 R 324 0 R] /K 1 /Pg 15 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 229 0 obj His argument is self-defeating. /K 6 /P 12 0 R 258 0 obj %PDF-1.6 /Parent 3 0 R 20 0 obj White, Dunn & Booker 1200 First Alabama Bank Building Birmingham, AL 32503, Albert C. Bowen, Esq. /K 4 /S /P /K 10 /Lang (EN-US) endstream endobj startxref /K [327 0 R 328 0 R] /K 15 As far as I can tell, Mary Ann Strickler, is still a licensed and practicing attorney. /Marked true /Lang (EN-US) Include the date to the template with the Date option. /Parent 8 0 R /Pg 43 0 R endobj /P 12 0 R 1992) (citations omitted). endobj 332 0 obj 79 0 obj /S /P /P 12 0 R << >> << Petitioners' Pro Se Emergency Motion to Disqualify Counsel for Defendants Doug Smith and CPP. >> /S /P endobj >> >> /Lang (EN-US) /K 0 /P 12 0 R /Pg 23 0 R UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PROSECUTORS MARK R. ROSMAN AND KAREN J.

Couples Massage Washington Dc, Malaysian Lamb Curry Slow Cooker, Articles R