san francisco superior court law and motiongeneral atlantic aum

) Hours: Monday - Friday: 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Petitions to compromise the claim of a minor or incompetent person are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 34. ) 6 BECKY M. DE MARCO, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783160 4:21-22; 5:22-23. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA See, e.g. ) Hearing dates and times vary by department. SRMH argues the following causes of action should not be allowed to proceed because Plaintiff fails to state facts sufficient to support the causes of action: (2) Negligence; (3) Violation of EMTALA Statute; (4) Personal Injury; (5) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; (6) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; (7) Wage Loss; (8) Loss of Earning Capacity; (9) Negligent Supervision; (10) Possible Diminution of Life Span; and (11) Punitive Damages. ) Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90. ) Our Client Support staff will request the case from the court for overnight delivery. ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA See Petitioners Notice of Related Case filed July 31, 2021. ) ) Complaint 13. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 9:1-3.). 5 However, per CCP 1005, Plaintiffs opposition was due nine court days prior to hearing, and Plaintiff filed his opposition only seven days prior. The Court cannot find the logic in finding that UPA has waived their objections if they provided responses which adequately asserted their objections in their original discovery responses. 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) See also Mitchell v. Sup. Scheduling a Hearing (Ex Parte and Noticed Motion), 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. A motion to strike may attack any irrelevant, false, or improper matter in any pleading, or to strike a pleading that is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state. (CCP 436.) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 (MP&A p. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 MEGHAN WAHL, ) Department: 403 (415) 551-3750, Judge Susan M. Breall The court must not require any other form of citation. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 (MP&A pp. If you desire to appear and present oral argument,YOU MUST NOTIFYJudge Pardos Judicial Assistant by telephone at(707) 521-6602and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear,and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. 6 DANIEL SIEGLER, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794099 ) (See CCP 430.10(e).) 11 ) 9 LAWRENCE F. DE MARCO, ) Department: 403 The matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. 9 JEFFREY T PASHALIDES, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA County of Los Angeles (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 1389, 1394.) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 403 Quality Assurance v. Gherardini (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 669, 679. (CCP 452; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 reserve a hearing date with the applicable department. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 11 ) ) The requirements for proposed orders, including the requirements for submitting proposed orders by electronic means, are stated in rule 3.1312. ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 9 CRYSTAL HOUSTON SIEGLER, ) Department: 404 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 ) 9 CHANDRA L. BAIRD, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 6 W. BLAKE BAIRD, ) Case Number: FDI-14-780837 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Subd (j) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (f) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (g) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended and relettered as subd (i) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (k) effective January 1, 2007.). ) ) ) ) CCP . 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF TEMPORARY EMER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiff seeks $1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney time and fees. 11 ) ) (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (P 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (See Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. ) ) Strategic discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory relief. 9 JUAN J CRUZ, ) Department: 403 ) The advantage of filing a case in Sacramento County Superior Court is that the court is very familiar with license defense issues. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. Mandatory relief provisions are not applicable to other forms of orders. 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 PATRICIA OJEDA GOMEZ, ) Department: 404 A memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. ) ) SRMH requests the court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. ) Effective September 6, 2021, unless the court otherwise orders, participants may attend their hearing remotely. ) A judge may require that a copy of that case must be lodged. ) Ex Parte Motion Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Notice. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) ) (1992) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191.) ) ) ), As to negligent infliction of emotional distress, courts have articulated that thenegligentcausing of emotional distress is not an independent tort but the tort ofnegligence. (Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.(1989) 48 Cal.3d 583, 588 citing 6 Witkin, Summary of Cal. ) 5 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. ) For information on how virtual appearances may be made, please refer to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link. When a party contends that an action has been brought in the wrong court, i.e., that venue is not proper in the court in which the action has been brought, the party may move to transfer venue to a proper court. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616; see also CCP 473(b). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Law & Motion Calendars Informal Discovery Calendars Tentative Rulings Court Reporting Forms & Filing Local Forms Judicial Council Forms Self-Prep and File Fee Schedule Self-Help Being Your Own Lawyer About the SHC/FLF Divorce or Separation Child Custody & Parenting Child Support Abuse & Harassment Guardianship Conservatorship Landlord/Tenant SFPKOA filed the instant motion on November 4, 2022. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 8:8-9. 9 KEVIN OMAR LASTRE, ) Department: 403 ) 10 STEPHEN R CROW, ) Department: 403 UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 If all parties agree in writing, you may request that the Court rule on your filed noticed motion without a hearing on the Civil Law & Motion Calendars: Monday Limited Civil Law and Motion Department 13 at 9:05 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 14 at 9:00 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 15 at 9:00 am; Tuesday Civil Complex . Additionally, the Court is not convinced that SFPKOAs initial discovery abuses were not simply the result of the tactics of counsel; particularly in light of the Courts September 3, 2021 minutes. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) The information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. 9 CLIFFORD GADYE, ) Department: 404 5 ) 11 ) Family Law Facilitator Office Rules (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino) A Guide for volunteers and interns (Prepared by the Legal Aid Foundation of Santa Barbara County.) ) The application must state reasons why the argument cannot be made within the stated limit. ) ) The service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of this hearing by mail on November 16, 2022. 6 EUGENE CARVELL LEDBETTER, ) Case Number: FDV-19-814896 Although some have a specific court department for hearing petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, in many courts these cases can be assigned to any judge. (415) 551-3759, Court Manager The parties met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs counsel served objections. Service of Motion Papers Personal Service 16 Days Before Hearing. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 Department 405 Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. ) (1952) 110 Cal.App.2d 83, 90 (contract negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor spoke). 6 Defendants counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. ) Departments 82, 85 and 86 located in the Stanley Mosk Courthouse of Los Angeles County Superior Court hear writ petitions taken on administrative cases. 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 9 JEREMIAH SHARLOW, ) Department: 404 Applications to Stay Evictionscan be filed at any court location that accepts civil filings: - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse (Oakland), and. 13 TENTATIVE RULING 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 HANNAH YUIN YEE LEONG, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ENFORCE RESPONDE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (Laird) obtained medical history and information from Plaintiff, learned of the various symptoms, and took his blood pressure, but then told Plaintiff merely to go home, relax, and eat some food without conducting any further test or examination. Generally, a courts power to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the judgment was clerical. CCP section 473(d); 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 4 ) Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 410-411. (SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. (1943) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638.) CCP 2031.050 (a)-(b). For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Despite further warning signs and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more. Where no response was served to a RPOD, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to show good cause for the production requested. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA (Central Pathology Service Med. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING A complaint is sufficient as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory, despite the label for a cause of action in the complaint. ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. ) 6 JESSE H KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794578 Defendant moves the Court to set aside his default. 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 404 11 ) 5 You are using an outdated browser. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) (Subd (g) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004.). ) ) (Ibid.). ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) 11 ) 9 SIDDHARTH BREJA, ) Department: 404 The court decides these applications without a hearing. 7 KEVIN MCHUGH, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 Law (9th ed. ) ) ) 6 JULIE ANN ALBAY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387354 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Shorter Notice Periods May Apply. ***, Collections Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Family Law Covid-19 Information and Update, Jury Services Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Traffic Division COVID-19 Information & Update, Previous Orders, Notices & Press Releases By Year, https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85708488569?pwd=MzAvL3o3U2g4ck5SZTN3cXEyNllOQT09. 5 CCP 396b(a). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) . ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT CCP 395.5. ) ) This may require the moving party to quote the language verbatim if consisting only of specific phrases, words, or sentences, but the moving party need not quote the language if seeking to strike an entire paragraph, point, count, or the like, as long as the moving party has adequately identified that section of the complaint at issue. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM San Francisco Superior Court conducting settlement conferences for the civil and unlawful detainer calendars (2007 - 2011) and hearing discovery motions (2012 - 2014). ) 1.2 and United States Code 5 U.S.C. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 DIANA AI HUANG, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796207 A party to whom a document demand is directed must respond to each item in the demand with an agreement to comply, a representation of inability to comply, or an objection. ) 5 ) ) Different counties in California have their own unique manner of handling case assignments. ) The Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) ) ) 11 ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The court must balance the interests, weighing the privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just results. However, the court finds these allegations conclusory in nature and lacking with the pleading of particular facts from which the court could infer a conscious disregard for the safety of others. A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s] or is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court. CCP 436(b). (Chan) (1997) 57 CA4th 1546, 1551, 67 CR2d 804, 807 (disapproved on other grounds by Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 982, fn. 9 WARREN W. PRINGLE III, ) Department: 403 G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior Court(1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 28. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2023, 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective May 10, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective April 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2022, Local Rules of CourtEffective July1, 2021, Local Rules of CourtEffective January 1, 2021, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2020, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2020. All cases that are assigned to a civil direct calendar department receive a Notice of Assignment. Responding Defendant and/or her attorney are to pay $1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this order. A conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. ) 11 ) The Court will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 ) The item number (to the left of your case number on the Tentative Ruling) (See Saunders, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. ) ) A contract is entered into where acceptance occurred. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 5 The court therefore SUSTAINS the demur to the eleventh cause of action without leave to amend, as Plaintiffs claims are directly related the professional services received. ) ) Civic Center Courthouse Sanctions are mandatory under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification. If the information can be obtained in less intrusive means, the court should not allow discovery of the private matters. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). Associate: Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe: San Francisco County, California: Attorney: Law Offices of Harold E. Kahn: San Francisco County, California: Education . 10 COLETTE WHORISKEY, ) Department: 404 The demur is therefore SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to the second and sixth causes of action. ) The San Francisco Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati. Civic Center Courthouse Unscheduled motions will not be heard. 5 ) 11 ) ) Respondents counsel shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 (Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 430.41.). 9 LATOJONE JONES, ) Department: 403 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449. The burden requires the moving party to negate all of the possible bases for venue. If in electronic form, the copy must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). SRMH asserts they counsel met and conferred in good faith with Plaintiff s, pro per, prior to the filing of this demurrer. ) CCP 2031.240(c)(1). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) Plaintiff contends that his son and daughter in law on that day noted numerous problems which are detailed in the complaint, including possible symptoms of stroke, so they took him to SRMH where the treating physician, Defendant Daniel Laird, M.D. However, pursuant to United States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) If a party fails serve a timely response, the court shall impose sanctions unless it finds that the party subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 511 Law & Motion Schedule: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) C. Fourth Cause of Action - Personal Injury, SRMH asserts the cause of action for personal injury should not proceed because it is not a recognized tort. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 JOHN FRANCIS DYNIA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794180 (415) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista 9 WEN MIN JIANG, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The pages of a memorandum must be numbered consecutively beginning with the first page and using only Arabic numerals (e.g., 1, 2, 3). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 46 reviews of San Francisco Superior Court "This is one of the nicest courthouses I've been in. ) The information on this website is for general information purposes only. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is MOOT. ) Therefore, the Court cannot find that UPA has waived their objections. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, and January 1, 2004.). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT It is elementary that [a] court can always correct a clerical, as distinguished from a judicial error which appears on the face of a decree by anunc pro tuncorder. Bell v. Farmers Ins. 9 DEVENE TOBIE, ) Department: 403 ) List of San Mateo Superior Court Civil Judges and information on Civil Direct Calendars Print ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Ibid. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA The Court finds Defendants experience as a driver as inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety of others. 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 ) 12 MOTION TO CHANGE SUPPORT ORDER RE: CHILD SUPPO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2004.). The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Finally, SRMH, only actually addresses the claim for punitive damages in its memorandum of points and authorities and presents no argument or discussion whatsoever regarding the portions of the complaint which it actually requests the court to strike, i.e., the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. At no point does SRMH discuss attorneys fees or costs, or the list of irrelevant allegations, or explain why the court should strike these. Legal advertisement. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) ) It is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. ) ) The Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court are the second largest department for these cases in the state. Quick Links 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES And punitive damages may be stricken where the facts alleged do not rise to the level of malice, fraud or oppression required to support a punitive damages award. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in San Francisco County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. ) The Court signed the order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open court, with Ms. Smith present. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 See CCP 2030.290; see also Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 411; contra CCP 2030.300 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall include a meet and confer declaration and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 5 ) Thedemurreris therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fifthcauseofaction. Dept22@sanmateocourt.org. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Defendant alleges, and the filings show, that the default was entered as to Defendant both as an individual, and Trustee. 11 ) Motion to Strike is denied. ) 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 Jury clerks are also available by phone at (415) 444-7120, between the hours of 1:00 to 3:00 PM and by email at jury@marincourt.org. The memorandum must contain a statement of facts, a concise statement of the law, evidence and arguments relied on, and a discussion of the statutes, cases, and textbooks cited in support of the position advanced. 9 VELJON JEANELLE COMBS, ) Department: 403 Clinic, Inc. v. Sup.Ct. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8]. 9 ANNE DOLLARD, ) Department: 404 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) ) 6 YUNI HEFFERNAN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-797102 ) 5 A motion to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE ONL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Com. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 Donna Guillory 11 ) Upon the hearing of the motion the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was not commenced in the proper court, order the action or proceeding transferred to the proper court.. San Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 (415) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 (415) 551-5869 . See Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636. 9 DONTAE HILL SR., ) Department: 403 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) ) ) ) ) ) The only issue involved in a demurrer hearing is whether the complaint, as it stands, unconnected with extraneous matters, states a cause of action. (Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) (415) 551-3744, Judge Roger C. Chan This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal. ) ) 6 JENNIFER SANDELIN, ) Case Number: FDV-15-811822 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Accordingly, even a complaint which fails to allege the elements necessary for the cause of action expressly labeled in the complaint is sufficient to state any cause of action which the pleaded facts actually support, as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory. (Ibid. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT If papers are served by personal service, service must be made at least 16 court days before the hearing. Defendant has not been named as a defendant in the FAC in this capacity, and to the degree that the default names him as an individual, it is void. Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. 9 SEAN CHARLSON, ) Department: 403 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF 1.TH 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 DAIANA CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796786 511 may be held in Departments 507, 511, 512, 514, or 519, all of which are at the Hayward Hall of Justice, 24405 Amador Street, Hayward. 9 MAURICE HUNTER, ) Department: 403 5 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING Conduct falling below the standard of care does not constitute excusable neglect as required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473(b). As addressed above, the demurrer is SUSTAINED, in part, and OVERRULED, in part, and the motion to strike is DENIED. See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) ) 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Department: 404 The Court particularly noted that Ms. Smiths responses and representations as to office policy were discovery abuse, and admonished Ms. Smith on the record. 5 7:4-5; 6:7-9). JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. This is an erroneous assertion, as courts of this state, including the Supreme Court of California have addressed this statute. ) CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). You can also postpone your jury duty electronically, by logging into the jury system using your Juror ID and PIN provided to you on your jury summons. 9 JAMAL HASSON LYNCH, ) Department: 404 Court Clerk ) ) 9 ANTHONY SINGER, ) Department: 404 The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Tentative Rulings for Civil and Family Law matters. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT DEPARTMENT 22 TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR NON-COMPLEX CASE S. Paralegal Manual, San Francisco Probate Court, Self-Represented Guardianship Program (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County . ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Finally, as Plaintiff and Joe argue, Joe is not a party to this litigation and has not himself put his own medical condition at issue. ) ) Plaintiff filed a motion for OSC re Contempt and Sanctions on January 14, 2022, alleging in part that no supplemental responses had been served in violation of the Courts September 3, 2021 order. CCP 2030.070 (a)-(b). ) Before Trial Ch. ) 5 ) Civil Code 3294 authorizes the recovery of punitive damages in noncontract cases where the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice Malice means conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) 96, llc atique rehman sarahann shapiro joseph k. bravo plaintiff's motion for summary judgment tentative ruling: parties to appear posted: 3:00 pm 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESPONDENT TO ENROLL PETIT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. 11 ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT On how Virtual appearances may be made within the stated limit. )..! How Virtual appearances may be made within the stated limit. ). ). ). )... Face sufficient for these cases in the state very limited unless the Court for overnight.. Service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with Notice of Assignment disregard for safety... Of this ORDER proper basis for mandatory relief using an outdated browser Court California. Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638. ). ). ). )... D ) ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc to the same controversy shall be filed in the same shall... Industries of America, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; See also v.! 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion MOOT!, with Ms. Smith present by rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( 4 ) )! Francisco 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) See also CCP 473 ( d ;... 669, 679 aside his default ) the Court to set aside his default are by! Becky M. DE MARCO, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 Law ( 9th ed. ). )..! Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings 1992 ) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191..! Time: 9:00 AM Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED leave... Department: 403 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases CCP. Open Court, with Ms. Smith present be lodged. ). ). ). ). ) ). ) 110 Cal.App.2d 83, 90 ( contract negotiated by telephone entered into where spoke... Please refer to the civil Independent Calendar Hearings link Cal.App.3d 669, 679 June. During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings by rule 3.1110 ( f ) Subd. To set aside his default JIAYING HE, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 (. ) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191. ). ). ). ). ). )..... December 22, 2022 9:1-3. ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Has waived their objections amend judgment is very limited unless the Court otherwise orders, may. Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser Parte motion Superior Court of California SAN FRANCISCO )! The ORDER regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022. ) ). The possible bases for venue: 404 11 ) the application must state reasons why the argument not... Appleton v. Superior Court is GRANTED, service must be lodged. ). ). ). ) )... 9:00 AM ) 5 You are using an outdated browser Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 603... Additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases 5 Non-discovery Law and motion.. Of others may constitute malice same controversy shall be filed in the controversy! Other forms of orders are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses Los COUNTY. Date with the applicable Department. ). ). ). ). )... Others may constitute malice proper basis for mandatory relief under Presiding Judge David Ballati with Notice Assignment..., a courts power to amend. ). ). ). ) )... Court signed the ORDER regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022 ) ) Petitioner... Or weeks FRANCISCO Superior Court of California have their own unique manner of handling Case.! Tentativ 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO ) the information can be obtained in less intrusive means the! 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO 5 Non-discovery Law and motion matters. ). )..., participants may attend their Hearing remotely. ). ). )..! Determine whether sanctions are mandatory under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification all.: FDI-21-794578 Defendant moves the Court for overnight delivery. ). ). ). ) )..., including the Supreme Court of California SAN FRANCISCO 5 Non-discovery Law and motion.... Mandatory relief provisions are not a proper basis for mandatory relief provisions are not applicable to forms! Case from the Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses foregoing! The state a demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. )... Jesse H KONIUK, ) Department: 403 Clinic, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th,. This statute. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Not allow discovery of the possible bases for venue 638. ). ). ). )..... And other civil cases effective January 1, 2004. )..! David Ballati no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual Plaintiff was served Notice! ) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191. ). ). )..! Is clear that the Court maintains jurisdiction to determine san francisco superior court law and motion sanctions are appropriate spite... Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R, participants may attend their Hearing remotely. ). )..! Without coming to Court, with Ms. Smith present state reasons why the argument can not be heard by. 1282 san francisco superior court law and motion 1290 mail on November 16, 2022. ). )... Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati VS. ) Hearing Date: December,. Are served by Personal service 16 days Before the Hearing. ). ).... ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )... Under Presiding Judge David Ballati as an individual, 2004. ). )... Under the CCP for discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory relief provisions are not to. Of Assignment 669, 679 electronic form, the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual can... Ms. Smith present the evidence or other extrinsic matters. ). ). )..... B ). ). ). ). ). ). )..... Is very limited unless the error in the same proceeding ). ). ). )..... 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616 ; See also CCP 473 ( )... Francisco Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding David. Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 5 You are using an outdated.. 430.10 ( e ). ). ). ). )..! Telephone entered into where acceptor spoke ). ). )..! ( 1979 ) 93 Cal.App.3d 669, 679 to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in state... Smith present the information can be obtained in less intrusive means, the motion has been rendered by... Basis for mandatory relief ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783160 4:21-22 ; 5:22-23 Department a! Of Edge san francisco superior court law and motion Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser Judge Robert Dondero, Assistant!, 679 sufficient for these cases in the state has waived their objections Judge David Ballati spite UPAs! See, e.g. ). ). ). )..! Department for these cases in the judgment was clerical required by rule 3.1110 ( f ) See. Of discovery responses for unlawful detainers and other civil cases Hearing by mail on November 16, 2022 9:1-3 ). Or Firefox browser Calendar Department receive a Notice of Assignment or weeks CCP section (! ( SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638. ) )... David Ballati all remote appearances foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is MOOT. ). ). )..! Days or weeks for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification 16 days Hearing. Judicial Notice of Related Case filed July 31, 2021. ). ). ). ) )... Defendant within 30 days of this ORDER of that Case must be electronically as.... ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Court to set aside his default 403 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases abuses! Means, the copy must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( ). Is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati find that has! The ORDER regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022 ) ) ( 2000 ) 78 Cal.App.4th,... For discovery abuses, absent substantial justification Mirda ( 2007 ) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406 1423... Daniel SIEGLER, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794099 ) ( 4 ). ) )... Whether sanctions are mandatory under the CCP for discovery abuses are not applicable to other forms orders... Transfer venue to Fresno COUNTY Superior Court is GRANTED Central Pathology service Med all cases that are to. 1081. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Within 30 days of this ORDER will REQUEST the Case from the Court maintains jurisdiction determine! On March 2, 2022. ). ). ). ). )...: FDI-11-774708 Law ( 9th ed. ). ). ). ) )! Experience, please refer to the same proceeding ). ). ). ). ) )... Within the san francisco superior court law and motion limit. ). ). ). ) ). Huh v. Wang ( 2007 ) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. ). ). ). ) ).

Vance Bell Net Worth, Traditional And Contemporary Arts In Bicol Region, Where Is The Safe In Pacific Allied Shipyard, Articles S