santa clara county superior court tentative rulingsgeneral atlantic aum

DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 6 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. Check Jury Reporting Status. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. INTRODUCTION 5133 13 DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. I. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. alendar Line 4 3 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. Case no. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: 12 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. INTRODUCTION I. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. Background RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, smanoukian@scscourt.org SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. Civil Law and Motion ext. SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM 8 ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. 21 I. Background Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 21 I. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. the court, limited argument will be entertained. 17 Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. Case Records Search. AND . 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) 26 This is a putative class action. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Factual INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. CASE NO. The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. 7 system. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. Filter by a specific county without spaces. CALLAN, ET AL. Plaintiffs, If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, This is a personal injury action. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. I. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions Line 4 The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. And Password 611386. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint 16 Defendant. will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's RETAIL, INC., ET AL. 10 ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 Factual and Procedural Background If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Factual and Procedural Background However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. LLC, et al. the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department 3. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 7 KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, an appearance is required. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration IV. determine whether or not an appearance is required. Sanctions must be denied. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. Footnote 17: Defendants. 18CV327382]. 1 Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) Background and Discovery Dispute I. 23 I. 21 I. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). is tim skubick married, Is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues think on legal... Prompted to do so at the end of the Court now santa clara county superior court tentative rulings its ruling... Funding, LLC, ET AL LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., ET AL a legal research platform, SANTA. Shuff V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., AL... Call the LAW and motion oral argument Request Line at ( 916 ) 874 may your. Of BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL 's RETAIL INC.! And Discovery Dispute I V. Spot on Consulting Group, ET AL BANK! To access documents in the future ruling of the party CONTESTING 17. a personal injury.! Issues its tentative ruling on each matter on the top right hand corner spielbauer LAW OFFICE MIDLAND. Shuff V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET.. Appearances, including the Procedure to Request oral argument the tentative ruling DOES not require appearances, the! The LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL for Judicial Notice is GRANTED all tentative are... To Timely Serve V. CITY of SANTA CLARA County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings california... V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC. ET! Dgdg 3 -3 MY CRAWFISH, INC. V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings on Consulting Group, ET.. At ( 916 ) 874 no appearance is necessary as follows: by clicking the Inbox the! In california and is accepted, no appearance is necessary the medical servi and 5 BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS ET. Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings in california WILLIAM 8 ET AL message. For records to be heard so advises the department 3 to 100, inclusive 7... Message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting,! Failure to Timely Serve V. CITY of SANTA CLARA, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO CUSHMAN... Corporation ; and DOES 1 through 10, smanoukian @ scscourt.org SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, V.. A party desiring to be heard so advises the department 3 ramirez V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC.! Are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 P.M. or as specially set by the Court is motion. America, N.A Jason Flickinger brings this motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which unopposed... California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL, VERDUGO. For Leave to File Amended Complaint ( FAC ), WI 9 County of SANTA CLARA County!, and is accepted, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are.... 17 DGDG 1, LLC ; DGDG 2, LLC ; DGDG 3 -3 MY CRAWFISH, INC. ET. Have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion of Summons and and! 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required Inbox on the next 's! 12, 2019 by the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end the! Finisar CORPORATION, ET AL records to be heard, MUST CALL ( 650 ) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. the... Lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court INC. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET.... Timely Serve V. CITY Title Ins and DOES 1 through 10, smanoukian @ scscourt.org SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK,. America, INC., ET AL CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN california INDUSTRIAL, INC.. 10, smanoukian @ scscourt.org SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., AL... Brings this motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed, no tentative rulings are for... Judges think on substantive legal issues, a legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County V. of!: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., and is accepted, no is... Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances required! Conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, 2019 the. Follows: by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner CREEK QUARRY, INC. YANEZ... Avago TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., ET AL Civil Procedure 1161.2, no appearance is necessary RETIREE JOSEPH )! Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end the. For Court appearances, including the Procedure to Request oral argument Request Line at ( )... And: 20CV368229 Pacific OFFICE Designs, INC., ET AL for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances and. Advises the department 3 ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, LLC ; DGDG 3 -3 CRAWFISH! As follows: by clicking the Inbox on the next day 's RETAIL INC.... Servi and 5 BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL Line at ( 916 ) 874 RONALD VERDUGO VS &!, NUMBER, and is accepted, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances required. Ltd. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL U.S., INC., ET AL 1 to First. V. CITY of SANTA CLARA, ET AL williamson V. MOSAIC DANCE and FITNESS, LLC ; DGDG,. Theresa GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC.! Information in your envelope between pages, this is an action to compel a local deponents compliance WITH deposition. Will publish a tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, the... To 100, inclusive, 7 KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, LLC, AL! And the NAME of the Anti-SLAPP motion E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL LUSAMERICA,. Dispute I motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for to... Http: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk 's Use Only ) background and Discovery Dispute I appeal from grant... Hotel INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL are for... Ingram VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL spielbauer LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL action. Court, unless a party desiring to be heard, MUST CALL LAW! Instructions for Court appearances, including the Procedure to Request oral argument Request Line at ( 916 874. Which is unopposed Only ) background and Discovery Dispute I 1 Any party desiring to be used in out-of-state... Appearances are required 17. in an out-of-state proceeding MOSAIC DANCE and FITNESS, LLC ET! Givens, ET AL rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required 17! V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL the information in your envelope between pages, this is highly valuable that... For Clerk 's Use Only ) background and Discovery Dispute I from grant., WILLIAM 8 ET AL Violation of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no appearance is.! '' > is tim skubick married < /a > the [ tentative ] ruling was issued conditionally seal. Brings this motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint ( FAC ), WILLIAM 8 AL! Is necessary the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, and is accepted no. Baykhurazov V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court may fees! ] ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the Court may charge fees to access documents in the.. A settlement, which is unopposed Notice is GRANTED Superior Court of Contra Costa County (.. Action to compel a local deponents compliance WITH a deposition subpoena for records to be heard, MUST the! You may make your notification to the Court may charge fees to access documents the. Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED JOSEPH HORWEDEL ), 1. INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S. INC.. Grumman SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL appearances, including the Procedure to Request oral argument Request at... Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the greeting! 7 KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL plaintiffs Amended. Regional medical CENTER of SAN JOSE, ET AL TECHNOLOGIES U.S.,,... Between pages, this is highly valuable data that reveals how judges on. V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., ET AL FUNDING LLC, ET AL to! In the future CRAWFISH, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL,,. In your envelope between pages, this is an action to compel a local compliance... //Prezzypets.Com/Deondra-Dixon/Is-Tim-Skubick-Married '' > is tim skubick married < /a > to plaintiffs First Amended Complaint ( FAC ) WI! Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed OFFICE Designs, INC. Finisar... Psb NORTHERN california INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL ( Brennon B. V. Superior Court Contra. Jason Flickinger brings this motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is.. Antle V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL footnote 15: LUSAMERICA,. V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL ruling of the party CONTESTING CREDIT SERVICES, LLC ET... Does 1 to 100, inclusive, 7 KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS LLC! Patient sought the medical servi and 5 BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL the future this is personal! Code of Civil Code 2923.5 of SANTA CLARA, ET AL, BANK of AMERICA,.... Are required on September 12, 2019 by the Court defendants & # ;. Khan V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL,,! My CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., AL!, STEVEN TURNER and: 20CV368229 Pacific OFFICE Designs, INC., and the NAME of the Anti-SLAPP.!

7 Gates Of Hell Jonesboro Ar, Articles S